Discrimination And Prejudice

harm is a term which is used in close of our daily conversations and means unconfirmed or untested formed belief, place, intellection or knowledge held nigh an entity or a group and it is interpreted as truth by the person or groups who holds much(prenominal)(prenominal) opinion, belief, attitude or knowledge, (H one and however(a)y, 1999). A typical framework is the belief of the western countries that Africans atomic number 18 primitive and nothing good comes from them. This statement qualifies as injustice since no test has since been carried out to confirm this claim blush though roughly western community widely accepts it.Another example to elaborate further prepossess is an opinion by Christian community that both Muslims and Hindus atomic number 18 sinners, not worthy of heavenly inheritance. The same is also the typical opinion held against Christians by adherents to other religious groups. This statement propagates prejudice since it is not true that adjacent a different religious belief makes honey oilwealth bad. Final example in this category is the belief by a group of people that Muslims atomic number 18 terrorists. Is it confirmed? secretion on the other hand is a term widely used to mean a process of agree unequal treatment or chance to different individuals, group of people, objects or events based on the views held on them. In this case accordingly, the factors about which collateral view(s) is/are held have higher probability of being given kindly treatment as opposed to those factors about which negative attitudes are held. By the same token, to discriminate refers to an act of giving unequal treatment to an entity or group with presume similar characteristics, (Cochran, 1999).For instance, the belief that Africans are primitive whitethorn influence someone from western countries to prefer an American as his/her individualised doctor all over an African medical specialist. A opinionful Christian is most is likely to appreciate neither Hindu nor Islamic faith and vise versa. Finally, most Muslims may not be given indorse to most countries as other nationals have access to this document with ease. It therefore follows that discrimination and prejudice are two interrelated words with prejudice possibly resulting to discriminationDiscrimination and PrejudiceDiscrimination is easiest explained through prejudice. Prejudice is when a friendly subject holds a preconceived notion about another person or a group of people, without judging from experience. Discrimination is when a cordial subject acts upon such preconceived notions. A common mistake is the concept that both prejudice and discrimination are hardly negative, as in a derogative notion of someone (such as the treatment mevery minorities were subjected to), barely, in truth, positive discrimination and prejudice are both viable, if there is a preconceived notion in estimate of someone.Both of these notions are those of inequality, the difference between them being in thought as opposed to action of some(prenominal) kind. In fact, its possible to be disadvantage and not discriminate, out of such things as fear or profit, and it is possible to discriminate for the same reasons and not be prejudiced. Though, most commonly, it is those who are non-white who discriminate, and those who are-non biased give equal treatment to their peers from different groups.There are tether types of discrimination, based mostly on the level of social deepness. There is in the flesh(predicate) discrimination, which consists of any personal attack on a minority member, from slurs to murder. This is any attack on the personal level, any interaction of particular military personnel beings. An instance of such an attack would be calling a transgendered compassionate spawn of Satan. There is legal discrimination, which is when a minority group is denied any kind of rights public institutions, business organizations, housing and any thing social, canonically.Any person who has ever been denied a job because blacks do not work as well as whites do (without looking at the prior credentials) knows what legal discrimination is like. And, finally, the most profoundly entrenched in society is institutional discrimination. This is when there is a customs of discrimination so deep that it is no longer viewed as discrimination, where a discriminatory idea is so old and seemingly natural, that even members of the minority group themselves sometimes believe it.A great example is that Romani are thieves. Despite all cultural tradition, if this stereotype werent upheld by society, building walls on their side of the Romani self-chose seclusion, their way of life might have changed over the centuries, like it did with many other peoples. There are four basic approaches to the matters of aging within society. The first is the functionalist approach, otherwise known as social disengagement hypothesis.It looks upon the with drawal of elders from society as natural, since they gradually lose social power, and hence remove themselves from social responsibilities as to make room for younker in functional aspects, while retaining the ability to engage in activities of their choosing, such as hobbies, should they so desire. However, the natural process (or interactionist) theory disputes the functionalist approach, by claiming that the to a greater extent supple an cured person appeases, the better their quality of life. They may disengage from responsibilities, but remaining active is necessary for a full life even in this age.Research supports this, despite criticisms that this may set unrealistic goals for the elderly. Their capacity for natural action does lessen, but activity remains a basic need for happiness, and demand to be fulfilled, even in this reduced amount. But if the elderly are happier if engaged in activities, why do they disengage? Conflict theory states that, since profit is the d riving force behind society, there is much hale on the elderly to leave their positions, so that younger, less expensive and more competent specialists may be hired, the elderly losing social value as time goes on.This seems more correct than the subculture approach, which states that the elderly, while disengaging with those younger, form subcultures among themselves to compensate. While subcultures may be formed, they are not the defining factor for the disengagement, but rather, one of its consequences. And last, the exchange theory on aging combines all of these perspectives, by stating that the elderly remain active socially (and thus, happy) as long as their activity is beneficial to all involved.By beneficial they do not mean only economic benefits, but also the exchange of simple human feelings such as love, friendship and compassion, though some elderly people remain engaged economically (for instance, by renting rooms in their homes), and thus allow themselves the possibi lity of social interaction. This also includes the functionalist perspective, for it shows how rewards are given in return for past productivity. This is the most comprehensive approach.